Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have heard about kids being cut from amateur teams because of the parents. Not sure, but I don’t think that could be the same reason for a PIHL team. They are loud, drunk, abusive, etc. There may have been some times where kids are skilled enough to make the team, but the coach(s) don’t want a parent around. Is this fair? Do the coaches or the parents have a bigger stake in the team? Obviously, the coaches have to coach, but the parents are paying. What or where is the line? Just want to see what the debate is. 

Edited by JustinCredible

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...