February 3Feb 3 Shane states in the article that the individual no longer works for him, why would you imply that his camp has anything to do with this individual or that his camp is going to have something like this occur? Your post seems very inappropriate and falsely implies something negative about Shane.
February 3Feb 3 On 1/30/2026 at 1:42 PM, bulldoghouse said: @bulldoghouse the link you posted has been removed. I don't find it relevant to post that since SC wasn't responsible for the actions of the person in the article. I know a number of goalies who went to SC, including my own son, and I had never heard of any issues with him.
February 3Feb 3 28 minutes ago, Shrimp Worters said: Shane states in the article that the individual no longer works for him, why would you imply that his camp has anything to do with this individual or that his camp is going to have something like this occur? Your post seems very inappropriate and falsely implies something negative about Shane. This has been handled.
February 3Feb 3 I agree the link has no place, but the camp in general does seem kind of questionable. A special camp where you stay at his house and the only way in is to personally call him. I'm not saying anything bad is happening, but it does seem like he's opening himself up to more liability than he should. But at 1750 a head maybe it's worth the risk for him
February 4Feb 4 My son has been coached by Shane and unfortunately Kyle too. All I can say is that I've never had a problem with Shane and he typically handles a lot of communication through his personal phone number... I've talked and texted with him many times over the years...
Create an account or sign in to comment