Jump to content
  • Sky
  • Blueberry
  • Slate
  • Blackcurrant
  • Watermelon
  • Strawberry
  • Orange
  • Banana
  • Apple
  • Emerald
  • Chocolate
  • Charcoal

Big Earn

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About Big Earn

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for the attempt at characterizating my parenting. If I upset you, then apparently I’ve said something that is true. All I’m saying is you aren’t new to hockey around this area. Go to a tryout and see for yourself, since you know how short life is, give your kid a shot.
  2. Hockey dad, if your kid plays at the AAA level, you’ll have to take the good with the bad. Generally, if your kid is good enough, his/her play speaks for itself. If you’ve been around hockey, as I assume you have, this message board can’t be your first go round with this topic. Coming off as a newb, as the kids say, isn’t working.
  3. That rebuttal doesn’t exactly prove that he’s wrong in what he’s said here, Rico. Stick to posting straight jacket pics and talking about the Jackson 5.
  4. You got it pal, I hope you get the most likes for today and win the public forum trophy. Good luck.
  5. Again, you suggest parents being hard/critical of their kids, refs, and staff. The stands I sit in, I don’t see this. Like I said, your experiences are different from everyone on this board, at least most. My response comes because I sit here reading advice from you and a few others who are suggesting you have all the answers, and the rest of us know nothing. Call it arrogant, condescending, or whatever you’d like. Again, it appears we can go at this for years, I’m just suggesting that you and the other geniuses on this board don’t have all the answers, and your experiences are not going to be the same as others, much like life, which it appears some may need to look to obtain one. ✌️
  6. I don’t see anyone on this thread stating their kid is making any show, do you? If you don’t like the squirt talk and you’ve lived it, maybe it’s time to move on and let these folks gain their own experiences. No one is asking you to read or respond to any of this. Happy posting.....
  7. Hoochie, that makes zero sense, and your comment suggests that the vengence are a second choice team. Not sure if you realize that or not.....
  8. Isn’t this post board created to discuss hockey? People seem pretty annoyed by the current discussion, but can’t hold back from responding to the “squirt” talk. Parents with older kids seem to forget their kids were once squirts, and this conversation took place then as well. This isn’t new......
  9. These two teams play 10 times, PPE wins 7 or 8 of them. Vengence have a nice team, but lack a scoring threat, plain and simple.
  10. PPE played half the game short handed, which could suggest the Vengence had an advantage in terms of skating. Issue is Vengence lacked a scoring punch with 6+ power play chances. Even if the goal that was called off counted, its a 3-2 game. What has to be frustrating for the Vengence is the penalties + shots were in the their favor. Bottom line is game leaned in Vengence favor and it still wasn’t enough. Oh and, the “goalie” that played half the game the Vengence claimed can’t win a game, ended up looking pretty stellar.
  • Create New...