sadday4hockey

So it sounds as though they attended the East/West Challenge and represented the West quite well?

You need only sit down and watch a NHL game on any given tonight to see poor officiating. Just like this afternoon's Penguins game. This game is on Nationally and viewers get to see two guys watch fouls committed and not make the calls. Then they decide that what happened in one post-whistle scrum is far more egregious than the previous 3 even though they were pretty much identical. If the NHL players are whom players strive to emulate then one would assume that the same is true for the officials and so youth refereeing basically mimics the game on TV.

This has nothing to do with the MS team, JV team or future Varsity team(s). It simply means that you can participate in Academy and not play for PPE. If you want your Gold bucket, you had better pony up for the Academy. Let's try it another way, it's hockey's version of Scientology.

Think of it in terms of sets in Mathematics. All members of the Excel Academy are not part of the PPE set, however all members of the PPE Gold set are members of the Excel Academy. Does that make sense?

If you are talking about the Golden Days of recruiting players such as Chuck Chiatto, Lynn Sipe, Mike Blum and Tony Taylor then the Excel Academy is certainly the way to go about it. If you are talking about actually building a program such as Central Catholic, then they aren't doing such a great job. They went from a Varsity team last year to only JV this year and just as one would assume, they placed that JV team in Tier 3 so they could beat up on teams just like the MS team did last season. The reason they only have a couple of MS wins this year is because of the way they ran the MS team last year. Same thing, play Tier 3 MS and beat up everyone. That does NOT help you improve. Question to pose, how many of those MS kids from last season that were in 8th grade actually enrolled at the school? The link to last season's MS standings http://pihl_hs.wttstats.pointstreak.com/players/players-division-standings.html?divisionid=95780 The link to this season's JV team standings https://www.pihlhockey.com/jvstandings The similarities are mind numbing.

So if they had to kill 10 penalties, that's 20 minutes of PP time out of a 39 minute game? If they went into a defensive shell, isn't that contrary to USA hockey and PPE principles of teaching systems?

Elite. How that word is used throughout USA hockey is simply amazing. I think it started in New England. Still smfh that the PPE call their teams Elite and Black and don't think that it's offensive.

All the trash-talking about the 16U team and yet they beat the Icemen top team 4-2 on Saturday. Maybe, just maybe they took the right players?

It's actually the 10U.

Departure of Dave Weaver and the corruption that ensued following his departure. They may be slowing regaining some footing as some younger age groups are getting their teams constructed.

https://www.lcahl.org/ https://www.wnyahl.net/page/show/105310-home It's done that way in both of these leagues. When the numbers begin to dictate that it's feasible, why not do it?

Looking at the AA Minor standings, it appears the death knell of the SCIR team were a bit premature. It's also interesting to see Westmoreland quietly sitting there was just one loss. Still a lot of season left to play but the standings thus far are intriguing to say the least.

Rico, Mr. professional evaluator that you are, why didn't you mention the the ties and the loss that occurred? Did they not actually happen? Were they a figment of someone's imagination? I don't know if they're a mess, but the word inconsistent certainly applies.

The lines of defense toward preventing stupidity on the ice and keeping players safe are as follows: 1. The parents - you spend the most time with them, teach them. Don't make excuses for them. 2. The Coaches - if they can't control themselves, sit them on the bench 3. The players - It's not the 1980's. Learn the rules and how to play within them 4. The referees - player safety is most important.

Momhockey has on the same goggles she wore when she thought she met Prince Charming.

BHD, while your post raises some interesting talking points it also provides a lot of inaccurate information and also undermines it's own credibility while rambling incoherently. For instance, being ranked that low is not good but it's not like they haven't won any games like some local teams of the past few years. The blowouts by Gilmour (notice the correct spelling) are pretty bad but this next part of your post makes zero sense. What the hell does this mean? Undermining credilbility again. Gilmour Academy is almost exactly 2 hours away. Amherst and the Regals? Pretty comparable competition and what 3-3.5 hours away? Wayne, NJ is 6 hours. Is the coach an insurance agent or what does this mean? You have some valid points but your approach needs refined.

#fakenews ? If it's posted here, it's Gospel. So as far as I'm concerned SHAHA went 2-0.

Having watched the QV-Armstrong game last night and the one this past spring in the PIHL playoffs, I find it very peculiar that the QV coach refused to shake hands with Armstrong Coach in the spring but was willing to last night. What's wrong with this guy?

JT, take your time and re-read the post. Try to comprehend what it says. If you feel you understand, then respond accordingly.

CLASS 6A (9 teams) Conference 1: Butler, Canon-McMillan, Central Catholic, Hempfield, Mt. Lebanon, Norwin, North Allegheny, Pine-Richland, Seneca Valley. CLASS 5A (24 teams). Conference 1: Baldwin, Bethel Park, Chartiers Valley, Moon, Peters Township, Upper St. Clair, West Allegheny, Woodland Hills. Conference 2: Albert Gallatin, Connellsville, Franklin Regional, Gateway, Latrobe, McKeesport, Penn-Trafford, Plum. Conference 3: Armstrong, Fox Chapel, Hampton, Kiski Area, Mars, North Hills, Penn Hills, Shaler. Not sure that I'd agree with such a blanket statement.

Based upon the quote below from Scooby Doo, I wouldn't listen to much of anything that they have to say. They say to skip "club" college hockey yet in the prior sentence they recommend ACHA D1/D2/D3. The ACHA is by definition a non-varsity or club team league. https://www.google.com/search?ei=UgC2W76OLZLH_Qa1zoGICA&q=ahca+hockey&oq=ahca+&gs_l=psy-ab.1.7.0i67l3j0i131j0i67l2j0l2j0i67j0.6442.6442..8523...0.0..0.69.69.1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71.pxilpaqa6II As the ages get older, the players remaining on those teams will be more serious and more competitive and want to win (speaking of AA and AAA teams). There are TONS of college hockey opportunities for girls at D3, ACHA D1/D2/D3 and they are all very good and competitive. I would personally skip "club" college hockey as that is basically recreational college hockey and there will be zero financial incentive to your player to play on a team like that.

There's no game center information about this game on Monday but apparently there was a major incident late in the game resulting in multiple lengthy suspensions. Anyone have ACCURATE information about this?

The Foxes are the happy place for mediocrity. They don't care about higher level teams because they don't the ice to support the practice time and any games other than the PAHL schedule. Their model works for them and the rink they play at so why try to change it? They have more than enough teams and players so if it ain't broke, don't try to fix it.